That effect was amplified by the rapid growth of these funds. For the quant funds, this effect is magnified, because they aren't merely observing the market, but using what they learned to take part in it. Scientists talk about the "observer effect," where the very act of observing a phenomenon, such as the behavior of animals, can change the phenomenon. What doesn't exist in the data that the quant funds comb through, however, are the quant funds themselves. As a result, they can easily come to similar conclusions about how best to invest. They are schooled in the same statistical methods, pore over the same academic papers and use the same historical data. Even if they don't share the same statistical models, quant funds share similar approaches to the market. The risks to quantitative investing may be rising. "In the long term, these are disciplined approaches that are doing things at every tick to look for value." "Quant strategies may be getting broad-brushed," he said. Pradhuman said quantitative investing still makes sense, and indeed many of quant funds that got hurt in the selloff have already made back the money they lost. The combined effect of some quant funds and other investors cutting positions in the stocks sent them lower still. When credit tightened, takeover prospects dimmed. Other investors had bid up the share prices of some of these companies in the belief that leveraged-buyout firms would snap them up at healthy premiums. When stocks started getting rattled last month after credit markets seized up, worries about business risk rose sharply and the shares of those companies bore the brunt of the selling. Since history had shown that buying small and low multiple companies was a good idea, many quant models screened for them. economy has been highly successful, taking the risk of buying the shares of such companies has paid off. Pradhuman said, is both smaller companies and companies with low valuations are more likely to go bust if the economy sours, so they are riskier. and health-care equipment maker Zoll Medical Corp.Īcademics, notably Eugene Fama at the University of Chicago with Kenneth French at Dartmouth, have documented how, over time, stocks with smaller market capitalizations and lower valuations tend to do better than the overall stock market. Small caps included printer Deluxe Corp., consumer-products company Russ Berrie & Co. and managed care provider WellCare Health Plans Inc. The midcap companies where quant funds held big stakes included packaging company Pactiv Corp., toy maker Hasbro Inc. These stocks also performed worse than other similar stocks. Pradhuman found 473 small-cap stocks, with market capitalizations of $250 million to $2 billion, where the quant funds owned 5 percent or more of the shares outstanding. Satya Pradhuman, director of research at Cirrus Research, which analyzes small and midsize stocks, found 148 other companies with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion where large quant funds owned 5 percent or more of the shares outstanding.Īs a whole, those companies' shares underperformed the shares of other midcap stocks during the selloff. The overlap in quant funds' positions wasn't limited to NVR. The shares have bounced higher since the selloff, but they are off 8.4 percent over the past month. NVR stock, which closed Thursday at $571 a share, trades less than most companies of its size. AQR Capital Management, another quant fund, held 0.9 percent of the company's shares and quant fund Numeric Investors had a 1.6 percent stake. Renaissance held 1.1 percent of the shares outstanding of NVR Inc., a Virginia construction and home-building company.
In a letter to investors, Jim Simons of the hedge fund Renaissance Technologies wrote the quantitative funds behind the selling "undoubtedly share some signals in common with our own, and the result has been losses." It didn't help that quant funds are among the fastest expanding categories of hedge funds.įilings with the Securities and Exchange Commission show that as of the end of June, quantitative hedge funds often shared large positions in the same stocks. In many cases, the managers pointed their fingers at other quantitative hedge funds, essentially saying they all owned many of the same stocks and their models told them all to sell at the same time, driving down the share prices, hurting everyone in the process. But they might as well have.Ī number of quant funds, which use statistical models to find winning trading strategies, reported heavy losses this month. The managers of "quantitative" hedge funds that got roiled in this summer's stock-market selloff didn't gather after work to drink beer and swap trading ideas.
0 kommentar(er)
